Timeline for Have story identification questions "overtaken" SF&F?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
21 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:43 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://scifi.stackexchange.com/ with https://scifi.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Dec 8, 2015 at 0:20 | answer | added | Organic Marble | timeline score: 5 | |
| Nov 13, 2015 at 21:19 | comment | added | user31178 | @user14111 Well I was quoting someone else, so I don't know about them. Both work. | |
| Nov 13, 2015 at 21:15 | comment | added | user14111 | So you meant "taken over"? | |
| Nov 13, 2015 at 20:52 | comment | added | user31178 | @user14111 Grown to be a problem, rather than a benefit | |
| Nov 13, 2015 at 20:02 | comment | added | user14111 | Is "overtaken" in the title a (Google Translate?) mistranslation? In English, "overtake" != "take over", and it's not clear how "overtaken" makes sense in the present context. | |
| Nov 12, 2015 at 23:18 | answer | added | Jason Baker | timeline score: 16 | |
| Aug 10, 2015 at 11:05 | answer | added | FuzzyBoots | timeline score: 8 | |
| Aug 8, 2015 at 9:25 | answer | added | Ixrec | timeline score: 13 | |
| Aug 6, 2015 at 22:59 | answer | added | Slytherincess | timeline score: 8 | |
| Aug 6, 2015 at 21:18 | history | edited | user31178 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1347 characters in body
|
| Aug 6, 2015 at 20:34 | comment | added | user31178 | @Catija I was referring to Richard and Michael. My goal isn't to push the A&C thing, or call anyone out, which is why I didn't link. I'm perfectly fine with the answers received. I just wondered if there was some history I'm missing, as I've only been on SE actively for less than a year. I often feel like there's stuff I've missed out on that shaped the communities. | |
| Aug 6, 2015 at 20:32 | comment | added | Catija | @TARS Ah, that makes sense. I still think the rest of my comment is valid but if someone wants to excise it, that's fine. | |
| Aug 6, 2015 at 20:31 | comment | added | TARS | @Catija I think he was referring to the commenters here on this very question and not the question on Area51 when he talked about "long-time users". | |
| Aug 6, 2015 at 20:27 | comment | added | Catija | I'm hardly a "long-time user". And @RobertCartaino is one of the employees and they're certainly likely to have strong opinions about things. Two people not liking ID questions doesn't mean that a community can't decide that they're OK... if Arts and Crafts wants them, they can, as a community, downvote our answers and upvote the "yes" answers... it doesn't mean that users who don't like ID questions can't try to prevent them showing up on other sites. | |
| Aug 6, 2015 at 20:27 | answer | added | SQB | timeline score: 10 | |
| Aug 6, 2015 at 20:18 | comment | added | user31178 | @TARS Well, it was the one referenced in my discussion, and the only one I frequent. It's huge popularity seems to be evidence that it's not a problem. But then again, the first two comments are by long-time users who seem to very much dislike those questions. I wonder what a graph of people using the story-id tag based on account length would look like. | |
| Aug 6, 2015 at 20:15 | comment | added | TARS | Interesting to ask this on the one site where those questions don't seem to be a huge problem. ;-) | |
| Aug 6, 2015 at 20:10 | comment | added | Valorum Mod | Indeed. If you visit scifi.stackexchange.com/users/preferences and set the tag to "ignore", you'll never see another one again | |
| Aug 6, 2015 at 20:06 | comment | added | KutuluMike | They've always been on-topic as far as I know, because I've had the tag on ignore for a long time. I absolutely hate them, but they are extremely popular on here and some people love them. | |
| Aug 6, 2015 at 20:01 | history | asked | user31178 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |