Timeline for Do we have room for a custom close reason for future works?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:43 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://scifi.stackexchange.com/ with https://scifi.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 16, 2017 at 16:38 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.scifi.stackexchange.com/ with https://scifi.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| May 3, 2016 at 9:35 | comment | added | TARS | @KutuluMike You, but maybe not others. Doesn't change the fact that this question and its answer is useful to the community. Noone said you have to be the one who takes the next steps outlined in the answer if you don't want to. But dissatisfaction with an answer has never been a valid reason to delete a valuable question. | |
| Apr 30, 2016 at 12:45 | comment | added | Valorum | I spotted the follow-up but I was puzzled by what you were referring to. For the record, this seemed a perfectly sensible question and one that needs asking, given that "Future works" is our single highest custom reason for a close. | |
| Apr 30, 2016 at 11:56 | comment | added | Valorum | This comment seems to indicate that you disagree. Perhaps you could be a bit more fulsome in explaining why, rather than simply attempting to delete the question. | |
| Apr 29, 2016 at 23:12 | vote | accept | KutuluMike | ||
| Apr 29, 2016 at 21:58 | history | undeleted | Rand al'ThorMod | ||
| Apr 29, 2016 at 16:51 | history | deleted | KutuluMike | via Vote | |
| Apr 29, 2016 at 16:29 | comment | added | Valorum | I tend to use the "custom close" text to explain why I've voted to close. Simply marking them as 'opinion-based' doesn't really explain to the user why you want to zap it. | |
| Apr 29, 2016 at 16:22 | answer | added | NullMod | timeline score: 5 | |
| Apr 29, 2016 at 13:12 | history | asked | KutuluMike | CC BY-SA 3.0 |