Skip to main content
deleted 1 character in body
Source Link
Valorum
  • 717.7k
  • 7
  • 118
  • 288

Getting a new custom close for our Future Works policy has resulted in one of our existing close reasons being removed.

"This question does not appear to be about science fiction or fantasy within the scope defined in the help center"

At the time it was originally added, there was a considerable consensus in favour of it as our third custom reason and I think it would be worthwhile having it back. It's quitevery often used and fits nicely with our existing policies.

Can we please ask SE to allow us a fourth close reason so we can restore this?

Getting a new custom close for our Future Works policy has resulted in one of our existing close reasons being removed.

"This question does not appear to be about science fiction or fantasy within the scope defined in the help center"

At the time it was originally added, there was a considerable consensus in favour of it as our third custom reason and I think it would be worthwhile having it back. It's quite often used and fits nicely with our existing policies.

Can we please ask SE to allow us a fourth close reason so we can restore this?

Getting a new custom close for our Future Works policy has resulted in one of our existing close reasons being removed.

"This question does not appear to be about science fiction or fantasy within the scope defined in the help center"

At the time it was originally added, there was a considerable consensus in favour of it as our third custom reason and I think it would be worthwhile having it back. It's very often used and fits nicely with our existing policies.

Can we please ask SE to allow us a fourth close reason so we can restore this?

edited tags
Link
edited tags
Link
TheLethalCarrot Mod
  • 144.3k
  • 1
  • 43
  • 103
Tweeted twitter.com/StackSciFi/status/1427374625642762240
Became Hot Meta Post
Source Link
Valorum
  • 717.7k
  • 7
  • 118
  • 288
Loading