Timeline for Blind closevoting?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2019 at 19:26 | history | edited | Alex | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Spelling/grammar.
|
| Oct 19, 2014 at 2:10 | comment | added | Slytherincess | I agree mostly with this post and think it is well reasoned. However, "not understanding" a question as a reason to VTC is less spurious than it is uninformed. I especially agree with you on people who don't know canon as thoroughly as some other might closing questions on the basis that a question cannot be answered. I don't know why this received a downvote -- like I said, it's well thought out. +1 | |
| Oct 16, 2014 at 5:10 | comment | added | DVK-on-Ahch-To | @curiousdannii - Yes they should if there's clear disagreement. And the point is that people don't make a nuanced judgement about whether something is bad or good subjective. They just yell "subjective" with no reasoning. | |
| Oct 16, 2014 at 5:04 | comment | added | curiousdannii | Clearly the so-called good/bad subjectivity is of course highly subjective itself! There's no objective standard of good subjectivity, so you can't fault anyone for judging a question as the bad kind of subjectivity. Nor should anyone have to discuss anything before voting. | |
| Oct 15, 2014 at 2:01 | history | answered | DVK-on-Ahch-To | CC BY-SA 3.0 |