9

Currently, there's a question here asking who was killed to make Nagini a Horcrux. Now, we have a very obvious question that already answers that here.

However, if you read through the entire body of the question, it's quite clear the person asking already knows that is a potential answer. To very, very briefly summarize, it seems to me that the asker is really trying to discover which source is more authoritative in this particular instance: The Half-Blood Prince or JKR in a Q&A session. Luckily, we have a pretty great question already asking that over here (although, it has multiple answers and the highest-voted answer isn't the one accepted).

Should we consider a question to be closed as a duplicate if it requires two separate answers from two different questions in order to completely answer the question? Or should the question stand alone and receive a proper answer that draws from the information contained in the two potential duplicate questions?

  • The highest voted answer isn't the accepted one due to a mixture of self-answering and merging questions. – ibid Apr 8 '16 at 16:57
6

I think we should let the question be.

Questions that can be answered by following the first link of a simple google search are closed. But if it takes several links to read and summarize, then a question is legit, even if the links to read and summarize belongs to Scifi.SE

So a good answer to this particular question would provide the two links you did, with pertinent extracts from each explaining why you consider one source or the other more canon.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .