I am new to reviewing edits. I've just seen three separate changes proposed which add or modify the authors original intended question/answer (but isn't wrong or contrary to what the author intended).
How I personally handle this sort of input is to write a comment under the question / answer suggesting the change or providing the new information to the original author.
I'd like to reject the edits but do so with comments suggesting that the additional information be provided in a comment under the original question / answer (but I don't see a mechanism to do this).
I only feel qualified to approve edits in grammar, formatting, etc. that don't substantially change the content of the author's work. Is this the correct approach or are my standards too strict?