I recently read this question about how the basilisk from Harry Potter could be so stealthy. It struck me in its similarity to a number of other questions about the basilisk, namely:
Most of which call for some sort of of speculation based on canon evidence. I was wondering what makes the first question non-constructive but the others not? Shouldn't they all be treated similarly or am I missing something about the first that lends itself to being non-constructive? Perhaps it could have been edited rather than closed.