Timeline for Is there an explanation of duties for each milestone?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:43 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://scifi.stackexchange.com/ with https://scifi.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:29 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 16, 2017 at 15:46 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.scifi.stackexchange.com/ with https://scifi.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 16, 2017 at 15:46 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.scifi.stackexchange.com/ with https://scifi.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 16, 2017 at 15:46 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.scifi.stackexchange.com/ with https://scifi.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Jun 26, 2016 at 22:07 | comment | added | phantom42 | If you're really interested, look at the review queue histories and look at how other people voted and the final results. You'll start seeing how things tend to go. | |
| Jun 26, 2016 at 22:05 | comment | added | phantom42 | The nice thing about being a non-mod without a gold badge is that your one vote is not enough to do anything by itself. If you're doing something "wrong", it'll usually be corrected or blocked by other users. That aside, there is nothing you can do that can't be undone if a bad call on your part does get through. | |
| Jun 26, 2016 at 9:46 | comment | added | Valorum | @KyloRen - The point of the moderation system is that it's led by its users. Having guidelines would subvert that. | |
| Jun 26, 2016 at 9:44 | comment | added | KyloRen | I see what you are saying and I don't disagree, but it would be better if there were some guidelines to follow. | |
| Jun 26, 2016 at 9:43 | comment | added | Valorum | @KyloRen - The privilege system is like training wheels. If someone goes wildly off task, there are checks and balances to prevent any single user from doing too much damage, firstly by not allowing unilateral closing, the chat system, private rooms, moderator messages and ultimately site sanctions such as temp-bans. | |
| Jun 26, 2016 at 9:37 | comment | added | KyloRen | You just proved my point. Why should we have closing powers if we don't fully understand them? There needs to be a guideline set out to follow **IF ** someone was inclined to do something with their new found powers. | |
| Jun 26, 2016 at 9:32 | history | answered | Valorum | CC BY-SA 3.0 |