Skip to main content
22 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:43 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://scifi.stackexchange.com/ with https://scifi.stackexchange.com/
Mar 20, 2017 at 10:29 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
Jan 3, 2016 at 18:04 comment added DVK-on-Ahch-To @Richard - I'm not intrigued at all. I have strong hunches as to why :)
Jan 3, 2016 at 16:29 comment added Valorum @DVK - I remain intrigued that a certain user has been allowed to remain on chat despite some very iffy behaviour in the last couple of days; swearing at users, making threats, personal abuse, etc/
Jan 3, 2016 at 16:26 comment added DVK-on-Ahch-To @Richard -I am unsure there's a major level of hurt. There's only so much ego boost one can get from continued validation of one's expertise in the form of extrinsic imaginary Internet points, and the psychological returns sharply diminish after about a month of sustained validation. After that, the main -to a 99% extent,ONLY- motivation is intrinsic: to learn more about your areas of interest or new ones, and to ensure other people learn as good information as possible about your favorite works.
Jan 3, 2016 at 16:19 comment added DVK-on-Ahch-To @Richard - I totally don't mind being banned from chat. If you recall, I voluntarily quit chat for a while, and only returned because a specific user explicitly repeatedly invited me back there. I do mind that a certain OTHER user isn't banned who deserves the ban far more than you do, but now we are veering offtopic and should probably clean up the comments
Jan 3, 2016 at 16:00 comment added DVK-on-Ahch-To @Richard - I was assuming you read sufficient Meta and chat contents last week to make an educated guess :) But let's just say you're only the second person to publicly state "you're not the site's evil troll", in this entire past week, if you would like one of the more specific reasons, that I'm aware of
Oct 14, 2015 at 19:17 history edited user1027 CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 5 characters in body
Oct 12, 2015 at 3:48 comment added user14111 @Emma No, you were quite right to single Richard out. You are not the first; some old high-rep users have also criticized his bragging.
Oct 11, 2015 at 23:52 comment added Tango @Emma: Overreacting to Richard is a frequent occurrence here. Don't worry about it. I think you actually raised a good point. And, I know you've said you're a bit of an introvert, but we'd love to have you join us in chat in Mos Eisley whenever you feel like you'd be interested.
Oct 11, 2015 at 22:10 comment added Emma Hi Richard. I've calmed down and think I was overreacting. Also I shouldn't have singled you out. I'm sure others make those comments and they are just for fun. I guess I need to get in the spirit of things. I hope I didn't rattle you too.much
Oct 11, 2015 at 21:24 comment added Valorum @user14111 - I've mentioned tag badges.
Oct 11, 2015 at 21:17 comment added user14111 Actually, there are always more privileges to be earned, via tag badges.
Oct 11, 2015 at 10:56 comment added Reinstate Monica - Goodbye SE +1 your first sentence captures my thoughts exactly. It is only a competition if you choose to make it such.
Oct 11, 2015 at 10:25 history edited Valorum CC BY-SA 3.0
added 9 characters in body
Oct 11, 2015 at 10:24 comment added Rand al'Thor Mod "two SE veterans" - I'm flattered! :-)
Oct 11, 2015 at 10:15 comment added Rand al'Thor Mod Did you know you'd now be on about 260k if not for the repcap? And @DVK would only be on 200k :-o
Oct 11, 2015 at 9:48 comment added Valorum @CandiedMango - citizenbrand.typepad.com/.a/…
Oct 11, 2015 at 9:46 comment added CandiedMango It's supposed to be unfunny
Oct 11, 2015 at 9:11 history edited Valorum CC BY-SA 3.0
added 22 characters in body
Oct 11, 2015 at 9:10 comment added CandiedMango Harry Potter around you mean? :D
Oct 11, 2015 at 7:52 history answered Valorum CC BY-SA 3.0