Timeline for Is the story-ID question that turned out to be about the Axe commercial, on-topic?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:43 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://scifi.stackexchange.com/ with https://scifi.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Nov 25, 2015 at 13:04 | vote | accept | SQB | ||
| Oct 7, 2015 at 4:28 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackSciFi/status/651614960657793024 | ||
| Oct 6, 2015 at 21:39 | comment | added | Möoz | Related: Are works that aren't SF per se, but have occasional SFnal elements on-topic? (e.g. spy movies) | |
| Oct 6, 2015 at 21:14 | comment | added | SQB | @phantom42 actually, I argue that the ad itself is on topic as well. So perhaps you should add an answer making your case. | |
| Oct 6, 2015 at 18:13 | comment | added | phantom42 | @JasonBaker the consensus is that the ad itself was off-topic as it's not a work of sf/f. thus, questions about it would be off-topic | |
| Oct 6, 2015 at 17:08 | comment | added | Jason Baker | @phantom42 I'm not sure I'd agree with that. Any questions about the ad are likely to be unanswerable, sure, but I don't see why they should be considered off-topic | |
| Oct 6, 2015 at 16:28 | comment | added | phantom42 | the question is on-topic. additional questions about the ad would not be. | |
| Oct 6, 2015 at 16:09 | history | edited | SQB | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Grammar
|
| S Oct 6, 2015 at 16:02 | answer | added | SQB | timeline score: 34 | |
| S Oct 6, 2015 at 16:02 | history | asked | SQB | CC BY-SA 3.0 |