Timeline for I am confused as to why this question "What is the exact step by step process of Borg assimilation?" was too broad and closed?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 2015 at 18:04 | comment | added | user16696 | Put it this way, if I had seen this before it got deleted, I'd vote to reopen. | |
| Jun 29, 2015 at 18:06 | comment | added | Valorum Mod | @MichaelEdenfield - Indeed. And when you can rope enough users together to undo a close vote, that's clearly time for a bit of a conflab. | |
| Jun 29, 2015 at 17:11 | comment | added | KutuluMike | @JMFB on the Stack Exchange network, "the community" essentially means the high-rep users. By the time you have accumulated enough rep to VTC/VTRO, it is assumed that you understand the scope of the site well enough to do so intelligently. Getting 5 of us to agree on anything is difficult enough that 5 close votes is practically a unanimous decision. | |
| Jun 29, 2015 at 15:24 | comment | added | Valorum Mod | @cde - Fair enough. Even if you're generous, it's still one question too many :-) | |
| Jun 29, 2015 at 14:02 | comment | added | user16696 | That's not really eight questions. That's basically two questions (required or optional steps for assimilation, and assimilation & sex organs). A question is not limited to a single question mark... | |
| Jun 27, 2015 at 19:06 | comment | added | JMFB | it's not really the will of the community. It's what, five people that have to have a reputation over 3000, right? That's hardly a sampling of the overall community. If it were I'd have -2000 reputation instead of +2000. In any event it won't be possible to get the votes. Its a shame because I thought it was a good question and I wanted to understand it better from others who might have other/better resources. | |
| Jun 27, 2015 at 19:02 | comment | added | Valorum Mod | @JMFB - I won't. It's not considered appropriate for moderators to defy the will of the community unless there's an overriding reason to do so. | |
| Jun 27, 2015 at 18:58 | comment | added | JMFB | I only "disparaged" 1 individual who was constantly doing bad edits that were not necessarily grammatically correct. This time he did it again & even edited out a quote from an article which is a definite no no. You can add a <sic> if you want but I was agitated & wanted him to stop, for the most part it was effective & he did. As for the 8 questions, it was one question. I can easily change those to "thoughts to consider." I have been doing that more recently as it's sometimes nit picky here on writing style rather than content. If I change the 8 to statements will you reopen? | |
| Jun 27, 2015 at 16:38 | history | edited | ValorumMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 3 characters in body
|
| Jun 27, 2015 at 16:05 | history | answered | ValorumMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |