Timeline for Are overly-broad tags "dangerous" now that there are tag-specific privileges?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar 20, 2017 at 10:29 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
Mar 16, 2017 at 16:38 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.scifi.stackexchange.com/ with https://scifi.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
Apr 9, 2015 at 22:17 | answer | added | user8719 | timeline score: 1 | |
Apr 9, 2015 at 3:09 | answer | added | alexwlchan | timeline score: 10 | |
Apr 9, 2015 at 2:49 | answer | added | The Fallen | timeline score: 7 | |
Apr 9, 2015 at 1:49 | comment | added | phantom42 | 131 questions tagged with "books" but not "story-identification" | |
Apr 9, 2015 at 0:54 | comment | added | KutuluMike | @JasonBaker if we're going to limit media tags to just story-id, then perhaps it makes more sense to have book-id, movie-id ? | |
Apr 8, 2015 at 23:58 | comment | added | Jason Baker | @randal'thor Well, in theory. In practice... | |
Apr 8, 2015 at 23:53 | comment | added | Rand al'Thor Mod | @JasonBaker Indeed, the books tag is only used to disambiguate between adaptations. | |
Apr 8, 2015 at 23:31 | comment | added | Jason Baker | I think this problem goes away if we restrict media tags to story ID questions; I've got no problem with proven story identifiers having a dupehammer for a particular media. To me, the bigger problem is that the media tags are also used to disambiguate between adaptations (Like the Harry Potter books vs. movies) | |
Apr 8, 2015 at 23:30 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackSciFi/status/585947742574403585 | ||
Apr 8, 2015 at 22:02 | history | asked | KutuluMike | CC BY-SA 3.0 |