Timeline for Are anthropomorphic animals by themselves enough to deem a work fantasy?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2017 at 16:38 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.scifi.stackexchange.com/ with https://scifi.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Sep 11, 2015 at 12:30 | vote | accept | SQB | ||
| Sep 23, 2016 at 13:06 | |||||
| Oct 12, 2014 at 16:50 | comment | added | user8719 | We have a close reason stating that "scientific solutions or explanations are off-topic unless they relate directly to a cited work of fiction". That implies that scientific stuff is on-topic if it does relate to a cited work, which in turn seems to invalidate your premise: the content of the material is important, and the intention is a good deal more subtle than a simple (and simplistic) binary distinction. | |
| Oct 12, 2014 at 16:24 | comment | added | Valorum | Ah, but the answer may (or may not) have something to do with the fact that he's a talking rat. | |
| Oct 12, 2014 at 14:02 | history | answered | Zibbobz | CC BY-SA 3.0 |