Timeline for Should we do away with the media tags (books, novel, TV, movies, etc.)?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 9, 2012 at 3:37 | comment | added | OghmaOsiris | I like this tag when people want to reference the book universe rather than the movie universe, etc. Like with HP. | |
| Feb 27, 2011 at 16:56 | history | edited | Mark RogersMod | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 272 characters in body
|
| Feb 27, 2011 at 16:41 | history | edited | Mark RogersMod | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 206 characters in body
|
| Feb 3, 2011 at 23:50 | comment | added | Tony Meyer | Note that many of the example tags have no open questions, so nothing really needs to be done with them. | |
| Feb 3, 2011 at 17:08 | comment | added | Mark Rogers | @Borror0 - Frankly, I'm having a hard time deciding which ones fit and which ones don't. | |
| Feb 3, 2011 at 17:01 | comment | added | Mark Rogers | @Borror0 - first comment - I believe that Tags are a great way to get redundant information out of the title, which often tends to get cluttered up with ancillary details. However you have a point about placing such information in the body of the question, that's why I mostly agree with you. | |
| Feb 3, 2011 at 17:00 | comment | added | Borror0 | Also, if you think some of them should stay, don't just say "some of them." List them and say why those ones are valuable, unlike the others. | |
| Feb 3, 2011 at 16:58 | comment | added | Borror0 | I'm not sure why you think that "it helps to identify what material source the asker is referring to." Shouldn't that already be explained in the title or the body of the question? | |
| Feb 3, 2011 at 16:56 | history | answered | Mark Rogers | CC BY-SA 2.5 |