Timeline for We need to take a look at list questions
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
22 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:43 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://scifi.stackexchange.com/ with https://scifi.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 16, 2017 at 16:38 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.scifi.stackexchange.com/ with https://scifi.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 16, 2017 at 16:38 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.scifi.stackexchange.com/ with https://scifi.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Apr 19, 2013 at 3:08 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackSciFi/status/325083483032649729 | ||
| Apr 3, 2013 at 16:09 | history | edited | sarge_smith | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 65 characters in body
|
| Apr 3, 2013 at 16:05 | answer | added | Beofett | timeline score: 4 | |
| Apr 3, 2013 at 16:02 | answer | added | sarge_smith | timeline score: 2 | |
| Apr 3, 2013 at 14:49 | comment | added | sarge_smith | @keen limited lists are, as I understand it, the only list questions actually allowed at the present moment. Those limits are still quite broad, however, and perhaps the answer is to tighten them(limited lists) down farther or that everyone is totally happy with the content that is being generated in them (limited list questions). I'll be (hopefully) convincing on a different tack though | |
| Apr 3, 2013 at 14:44 | comment | added | user1027 | @sarge_smith It's mainly a personal issue, when there are so many pronouns, I lose track of what they refer to. You used 'limited list' once, then only referred to them as 'they', 'these kind' etc. | |
| Apr 3, 2013 at 13:07 | answer | added | bitmask | timeline score: 1 | |
| Apr 3, 2013 at 6:59 | answer | added | DVK-on-Ahch-To | timeline score: 0 | |
| Apr 3, 2013 at 4:11 | answer | added | John O | timeline score: -1 | |
| Apr 3, 2013 at 4:02 | comment | added | sarge_smith | @keen limited lists are, as I understand it, the only list questions actually allowed at the present moment. Those limits are still quite broad, however, and perhaps the answer is to tighten them down farther or that everyone is totally happy with the content that is being generated in them. I'll be (hopefully) convincing on a different tack though. | |
| Apr 3, 2013 at 3:22 | comment | added | Izkata | Amusingly, I can see the reverse of one of the edited-out questions adding to readers' understanding of the characters and universe - the original, not so much. | |
| Apr 3, 2013 at 3:03 | comment | added | Beofett | @Keen perhaps I was wrong to remove those examples. I believe "limited lists" are the only ones currently allowed? | |
| Apr 3, 2013 at 2:38 | comment | added | user1027 | Okay, after seeing the examples in the original revision, I see that is what you're talking about. | |
| Apr 3, 2013 at 2:37 | comment | added | user1027 | Honestly, I'm not sure I understand what questions you're talking about. Is this about the "limited list" questions? | |
| Apr 3, 2013 at 1:37 | comment | added | sarge_smith | @Beofett thanks, I really was writing a much longer thing when I realized that the general case need to be looked at, and my opinions on the subject were powerful enough to override my normal filter :) | |
| Apr 3, 2013 at 1:33 | comment | added | Beofett | Since you asked, I've made some edits that I think may make this come across a bit more neutrally. Feel free to roll back or edit further if you disagree! | |
| Apr 3, 2013 at 1:32 | history | edited | Beofett | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Per the OP's request, I have attempted to reduce bias in the phrasing.
|
| Apr 3, 2013 at 1:25 | comment | added | sarge_smith | I tried to keep the question free of the taint of my own opinion, but I think somebody needs to edit to finish that process since I am clearly not objective on the subject. Thanks! | |
| Apr 3, 2013 at 1:19 | history | asked | sarge_smith | CC BY-SA 3.0 |