Timeline for Should we burninate General Reference?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
18 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2017 at 16:38 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.scifi.stackexchange.com/ with https://scifi.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Oct 24, 2013 at 15:35 | history | edited | user1027 |
edited tags
|
|
| Jan 4, 2013 at 16:48 | vote | accept | Beofett | ||
| Dec 31, 2012 at 19:33 | history | edited | Shog9 |
edited tags
|
|
| Dec 31, 2012 at 19:32 | answer | added | Shog9 | timeline score: 16 | |
| Nov 17, 2012 at 22:33 | comment | added | Gorchestopher H | We could replace it with "EBCAIUG", which stands for "Even Babies Could Answer It Using Google". | |
| Nov 12, 2012 at 18:36 | history | edited | PearsonArtPhotoMod |
edited tags
|
|
| Nov 11, 2012 at 14:16 | vote | accept | Beofett | ||
| Jan 4, 2013 at 16:48 | |||||
| Nov 10, 2012 at 3:42 | comment | added | Gabe Willard | What can I say? I was ahead of the curve by five months. | |
| Nov 10, 2012 at 0:02 | comment | added | Beofett | @MarkTrapp we're showing a much stronger consensus here than in that other meta discussion. The more votes we get for answers that say "gr doesn't belong on sff", the stronger our case. | |
| Nov 9, 2012 at 22:55 | comment | added | user366 | So who do we need to pay off to get this implemented? Really would suck to have this fizzle out again like last time. | |
| Nov 8, 2012 at 6:13 | comment | added | Gabe Willard | Tempted to VTC as General Reference. | |
| Nov 7, 2012 at 18:57 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackSciFi/status/266253167237423105 | ||
| Nov 7, 2012 at 18:53 | answer | added | bitmask | timeline score: 5 | |
| Nov 7, 2012 at 16:23 | answer | added | John O | timeline score: 2 | |
| Nov 7, 2012 at 14:38 | answer | added | Beofett | timeline score: 25 | |
| Nov 7, 2012 at 14:35 | answer | added | DVK-on-Ahch-To | timeline score: 2 | |
| Nov 7, 2012 at 14:02 | history | asked | Beofett | CC BY-SA 3.0 |