Timeline for What sort of Sci-Fi SE would appeal to Isaac Asimov or Robert Heinlein?

3 events

when toggle format	what		by	license	comment
Jan 25, 2011 at 1:14	comment	added	morganpdx		@Robert - I certainly think SF.SE would not just benefit, but thrive on SE. However, I am consistently seeing questions that would be considered subjective, yet which I would see as falling into that 'Good Subjective' category, being closed outright in the last week. It's almost as if the 'drive by closings' that @Zypher did have made the SF.SE community overcompensate by closing perfectly good, yet subjective, questions for fear of another such 'drive by'. Note: none of these questions are mine, for the record.
Jan 24, 2011 at 20:06	comment	added	Robert Cartaino		Your contradiction #1 (2) is deceptively outdated Good Subjective, Bad Subjective. What you call "forced into compliance", most people see as "raising the bar on Q&A." The rest of your advice sounds like "Scifi-SE cannot take advantage of the features and philosophy that make these sites great, so let's just start a forum like the 1000s others already on that subject." You may fee that is the case but that is tantamount to just closing this site outright.
Jan 24, 2011 at 18:36	history	answered	morganpdx	CC BY-SA 2.5