Timeline for Reopening a duplicate so you can add an answer, then reclosing it?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6, 2023 at 18:29 | history | edited | Valorum | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 9 characters in body
|
| Nov 6, 2023 at 8:30 | comment | added | John Rennie | @Valorum I deliberately used the term because that is, in a totally illogical way, what it feels like. I agree the term is somewhat brutal but it was coined because that's how it feels. | |
| Nov 6, 2023 at 8:27 | comment | added | Valorum | I don't think anyone is saying that you shouldn't post an answer to a question that might be a duplicate. On reflection OP may realise that they're wrong, for example. | |
| Nov 6, 2023 at 8:26 | comment | added | Valorum | We don't call it rep-whoring any more. It's considered 'not nice' | |
| Nov 6, 2023 at 8:18 | history | answered | John Rennie | CC BY-SA 4.0 |