Timeline for Should questions closed for lacking details be voted for re-opening even if the original issue hasn't been addressed?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 2021 at 15:42 | comment | added | Valorum | @TylerH - If I see a question that has been needlessly (successfully) closed, I'll vote to reopen. | |
| Nov 15, 2021 at 14:58 | comment | added | TylerH | "I'll vote to reopen any question that meets that criterion, regardless of whether other users have already voted to close." Can you clarify what you mean here? You can't vote to reopen a question that isn't currently closed (so, by extension, you can't vote to reopen a question that hasn't yet received close votes). Reopen votes can't be used to actively counter pending close votes, in other words. | |
| Nov 14, 2021 at 23:02 | history | edited | user14111 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Grammar: "that criterion" (singular) or "those criteria" (plurar).
|
| Nov 14, 2021 at 15:36 | comment | added | Valorum | @AncientSwordRage - Probably. If someone had posted a snarky comment about why they'd (wrongly) closed it. Or if the user was very new and I wanted to defend them against certain users who're known for being trigger-happy on the close. | |
| Nov 14, 2021 at 15:35 | comment | added | AncientSwordRage Mod | Would you ever consider commenting (unprompted) if you think other users have overthought closing? | |
| Nov 14, 2021 at 15:27 | history | answered | Valorum | CC BY-SA 4.0 |