Skip to main content
deleted 11 characters in body
Source Link
Alex
  • 45k
  • 8
  • 20

Some data from the site analytics (availabletools available to users with 2510,000 reputation) regarding close reasons:

In the last 90 days (that's as far as it goes back), the distribution of close reasons has been:

Close Reason # of Questions Closed
Duplicate 146
Opinion-based 44
Needs details or clarity 42
Not suitable for this site - This question does not appear to be about science fiction or fantasy within the scope defined in the help center. 25
Not suitable for this site - List/recommendation question 16
Not suitable for this site - This question belongs on another site in the Stack Exchange network 12
Needs more focus 12
Not suitable for this site - Real-world science question 9
Not suitable for this site - Other (add a comment explaining what is wrong) 9

Of the site-specific close reasons (i.e. those beginning with "Not suitable for this site") the one for not being about science fiction or fantasy is by far the most common.

In the list of 17 custom close reasons that were applied during this period, only two of them were about Future Works. By contrast, six of them were some form of "it's not science fiction or fantasy".

Of course, there may be some confounding factors here, such as if users are using the "Opinion-based" close reason to cover Future Works.

While it is not strictly necessary, since you can just use a custom close reason, I see no downside to having an additional close reason for the generic "this is not about science fiction or fantasy".

Some data from the site analytics (available to users with 25,000 reputation) regarding close reasons:

In the last 90 days (that's as far as it goes back), the distribution of close reasons has been:

Close Reason # of Questions Closed
Duplicate 146
Opinion-based 44
Needs details or clarity 42
Not suitable for this site - This question does not appear to be about science fiction or fantasy within the scope defined in the help center. 25
Not suitable for this site - List/recommendation question 16
Not suitable for this site - This question belongs on another site in the Stack Exchange network 12
Needs more focus 12
Not suitable for this site - Real-world science question 9
Not suitable for this site - Other (add a comment explaining what is wrong) 9

Of the site-specific close reasons (i.e. those beginning with "Not suitable for this site") the one for not being about science fiction or fantasy is by far the most common.

In the list of 17 custom close reasons that were applied during this period, only two of them were about Future Works. By contrast, six of them were some form of "it's not science fiction or fantasy".

Of course, there may be some confounding factors here, such as if users are using the "Opinion-based" close reason to cover Future Works.

While it is not strictly necessary, since you can just use a custom close reason, I see no downside to having an additional close reason for the generic "this is not about science fiction or fantasy".

Some data from the tools available to users with 10,000 reputation regarding close reasons:

In the last 90 days (that's as far as it goes back), the distribution of close reasons has been:

Close Reason # of Questions Closed
Duplicate 146
Opinion-based 44
Needs details or clarity 42
Not suitable for this site - This question does not appear to be about science fiction or fantasy within the scope defined in the help center. 25
Not suitable for this site - List/recommendation question 16
Not suitable for this site - This question belongs on another site in the Stack Exchange network 12
Needs more focus 12
Not suitable for this site - Real-world science question 9
Not suitable for this site - Other (add a comment explaining what is wrong) 9

Of the site-specific close reasons (i.e. those beginning with "Not suitable for this site") the one for not being about science fiction or fantasy is by far the most common.

In the list of 17 custom close reasons that were applied during this period, only two of them were about Future Works. By contrast, six of them were some form of "it's not science fiction or fantasy".

Of course, there may be some confounding factors here, such as if users are using the "Opinion-based" close reason to cover Future Works.

While it is not strictly necessary, since you can just use a custom close reason, I see no downside to having an additional close reason for the generic "this is not about science fiction or fantasy".

Source Link
Alex
  • 45k
  • 8
  • 20

Some data from the site analytics (available to users with 25,000 reputation) regarding close reasons:

In the last 90 days (that's as far as it goes back), the distribution of close reasons has been:

Close Reason # of Questions Closed
Duplicate 146
Opinion-based 44
Needs details or clarity 42
Not suitable for this site - This question does not appear to be about science fiction or fantasy within the scope defined in the help center. 25
Not suitable for this site - List/recommendation question 16
Not suitable for this site - This question belongs on another site in the Stack Exchange network 12
Needs more focus 12
Not suitable for this site - Real-world science question 9
Not suitable for this site - Other (add a comment explaining what is wrong) 9

Of the site-specific close reasons (i.e. those beginning with "Not suitable for this site") the one for not being about science fiction or fantasy is by far the most common.

In the list of 17 custom close reasons that were applied during this period, only two of them were about Future Works. By contrast, six of them were some form of "it's not science fiction or fantasy".

Of course, there may be some confounding factors here, such as if users are using the "Opinion-based" close reason to cover Future Works.

While it is not strictly necessary, since you can just use a custom close reason, I see no downside to having an additional close reason for the generic "this is not about science fiction or fantasy".