In the question What is Kronos Corporation?, the accepted answer states:

In the mainstream 616 Marvel universe, The Kronas Corporation was [...]

This Kronos/Kronas discrepancy is not further addressed in the answer itself, and perhaps understandably created some confusion, with a user in the comments asking for confirmation ("Kronas, surely?"), and the OP insisting that in-game it is definitely Kronos and not Kronas.

Digging in the linked wiki page, I found out that the subject fictional corporation was later rebranded as Kronos Corporation, so I suggested the following edit:

In the mainstream 616 Marvel universe, The Kronas Corporation (later rebranded as Kronos Corporation) was [...]

with the comment:

added rebranded name according to the wiki link, after comments

But my suggested edit was rejected by both reviewers:

This edit does not make the post even a little bit easier to read, easier to find, more accurate or more accessible. Changes are either completely superfluous or actively harm readability.

Given the discrepancy of a question about Kronos and an answer about Kronas, and the unresolved confusion and ambiguity expressed in the comments, it is hard to see how my suggested edit did not help to make the answer more accurate.

So, any ideas as to why it was rejected?

In the question What is Kronos Corporation?, the accepted answer states:

In the mainstream 616 Marvel universe, The Kronas Corporation was [...]

This Kronos/Kronas discrepancy is not further addressed in the answer itself, and perhaps understandably created some confusion, with a user in the comments asking for confirmation ("Kronas, surely?"), and the OP insisting that in-game it is definitely Kronos and not Kronas.

Digging in the linked wiki page, I found out that the subject fictional corporation was later rebranded as Kronos Corporation, so I suggested the following edit:

In the mainstream 616 Marvel universe, The Kronas Corporation (later rebranded as Kronos Corporation) was [...]

with the comment:

added rebranded name according to the wiki link, after comments

But my suggested edit was rejected by both reviewers:

This edit does not make the post even a little bit easier to read, easier to find, more accurate or more accessible. Changes are either completely superfluous or actively harm readability.

Given the discrepancy of a question about Kronos and an answer about Kronas, and the unresolved confusion and ambiguity expressed in the comments, it is hard to see how my suggested edit did not help to make the answer more accurate.

So, any ideas as to why it was rejected? And should it be?

In the question What is Kronos Corporation?, the accepted answer states:

In the mainstream 616 Marvel universe, The Kronas Corporation was [...]

This Kronos/Kronas discrepancy is not further addressed in the answer itself, and perhaps understandably created some confusion, with a user in the comments asking for confirmation ("Kronas, surely?"), and the OP insisting that in-game it is definitely Kronos and not Kronas.

Digging in the linked wiki page, I found out that the subject fictional corporation was later rebranded as Kronos Corporation, so I suggested the following edit:

In the mainstream 616 Marvel universe, The Kronas Corporation (later rebranded as Kronos Corporation) was [...]

with the comment:

added rebranded name according to the wiki link, after comments

But my suggested edit was rejected by both reviewers:

This edit does not make the post even a little bit easier to read, easier to find, more accurate or more accessible. Changes are either completely superfluous or actively harm readability.

Given the discrepancy of a question about Kronos and an answer about Kronas, and the unresolved confusion and ambiguity expressed in the comments, it is hard to see how my suggested edit did not help to improve the answer.

So, any ideas as to why it was rejected?

In the question What is Kronos Corporation?, the accepted answer states:

In the mainstream 616 Marvel universe, The Kronas Corporation was [...]

This Kronos/Kronas discrepancy is not further addressed in the answer itself, and perhaps understandably created some confusion, with a user in the comments asking for confirmation ("Kronas, surely?"), and the OP insisting that in-game it is definitely Kronos and not Kronas.

Digging in the linked wiki page, I found out that the subject fictional corporation was later rebranded as Kronos Corporation, so I suggested the following edit:

In the mainstream 616 Marvel universe, The Kronas Corporation (later rebranded as Kronos Corporation) was [...]

with the comment:

added rebranded name according to the wiki link, after comments

But my suggested edit was rejected by both reviewers:

This edit does not make the post even a little bit easier to read, easier to find, more accurate or more accessible. Changes are either completely superfluous or actively harm readability.

Given the discrepancy of a question about Kronos and an answer about Kronas, and the unresolved confusion and ambiguity expressed in the comments, it is hard to see how my suggested edit did not help to make the answer more accurate.

So, any ideas as to why it was rejected?

In the question What is Kronos Corporation?, the accepted answer states:

In the mainstream 616 Marvel universe, The Kronas Corporation was [...]

This Kronos/Kronas discrepancy is not further addressed in the answer itself, and perhaps understandably created some confusion, with a user in the comments asking for confirmation ("Kronas, surely?"), and the OP insisting that in-game it is definitely Kronos and not Kronas.

Digging in the linked wiki page, I found out that the subject fictional corporation was later rebranded as Kronos Corporation, so I suggested the following edit:

In the mainstream 616 Marvel universe, The Kronas Corporation (later rebranded as Kronos Corporation) was [...]

with the comment:

added rebranded name according to the wiki link, after comments

But my suggested edit was rejected by both reviewers:

This edit does not make the post even a little bit easier to read, easier to find, more accurate or more accessible. Changes are either completely superfluous or actively harm readability.

Given the discrepancy of a question about Kronos and an answer about Kronas, and the unresolved confusion and ambiguity expressed in the comments, it is hard to see how my suggested edit did not help to improve the answer.

It's worth mentioning that googling "kronos corporation" as per the question exact spelling does not return the desired answer among the top results.

So, any ideas as to why my suggested edit was rejected?

In the question What is Kronos Corporation?, the accepted answer states:

In the mainstream 616 Marvel universe, The Kronas Corporation was [...]

This Kronos/Kronas discrepancy is not further addressed in the answer itself, and perhaps understandably created some confusion, with a user in the comments asking for confirmation ("Kronas, surely?"), and the OP insisting that in-game it is definitely Kronos and not Kronas.

Digging in the linked wiki page, I found out that the subject fictional corporation was later rebranded as Kronos Corporation, so I suggested the following edit:

In the mainstream 616 Marvel universe, The Kronas Corporation (later rebranded as Kronos Corporation) was [...]

with the comment:

added rebranded name according to the wiki link, after comments

But my suggested edit was rejected by both reviewers:

This edit does not make the post even a little bit easier to read, easier to find, more accurate or more accessible. Changes are either completely superfluous or actively harm readability.

Given the discrepancy of a question about Kronos and an answer about Kronas, and the unresolved confusion and ambiguity expressed in the comments, it is hard to see how my suggested edit did not help to improve the answer.

So, any ideas as to why it was rejected?