Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 16, 2020 at 9:30 history edited CommunityBot
Commonmark migration
May 12, 2019 at 8:22 comment added user15742 That doesn't prove it wasn't you all along. ;)
May 12, 2019 at 8:12 comment added Valorum For the record, I forgot to downvote your Potter question when I voted to close it. I'd do so now, but I don't want to make you more paranoid than you already are ;-)
May 12, 2019 at 8:08 comment added Valorum @fredsbend - Two in a minutes is significantly different from four in thirty seconds, immediately after you'd been having an argument with someone.
May 12, 2019 at 8:07 history edited Valorum CC BY-SA 4.0
added 16 characters in body
May 12, 2019 at 8:06 comment added user15742 It's very similar to the last time. Similar enough that I copied and pasted some of that post here. skeptics.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3791/…
May 12, 2019 at 8:05 comment added Valorum @fredsbend - And the downvote on your potter question is only one of a pair, so it's clear that the question already isn't universally popular.
May 12, 2019 at 8:04 comment added Valorum @fredsbend - All that means is that they had those questions open at much the same time. The votes were 20 seconds apart and there were only two of them. If they were systematically downvoting you, they'd be only a few seconds apart and there'd be a hell of a lot more of them.
May 12, 2019 at 8:03 comment added user15742 The first two votes were made in the same minute ... no comments. In your hypothetical, we should then expect upvotes with downvotes, unless this user typically only downvotes. All of these things are unusual. For the record, I don't view downvotes negatively, nor do I complain about them. I care that it looks like something other than genuine voting.
May 12, 2019 at 7:56 history answered Valorum CC BY-SA 4.0