Timeline for How precise do the close reasons have to be?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 2018 at 22:54 | history | edited | Alex | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Missing words.
|
| Sep 17, 2018 at 22:23 | comment | added | Rand al'Thor Mod | My suggestion would've been more along the lines of "Are the UWYA and POB close reasons being misused for generic closeworthy questions which don't really fit any of the existing reasons?" But maybe that's too long for a title. I agree that imprecise is better than confrontational, in this context. | |
| Sep 17, 2018 at 22:21 | answer | added | Rand al'ThorMod | timeline score: 3 | |
| Sep 17, 2018 at 22:14 | comment | added | Blackwood | I came across your first example in the close vote queue. I didn't think it was a good question and had my doubts that it was a serious question, but it didn't seem to meet the requirements to be closed. I ended up holding my nose and voting to keep it open. I also down voted it. | |
| Sep 17, 2018 at 22:10 | comment | added | Alex | @Randal'Thor I edited it. I'm not sure it fully captures the question now, but it's certainly less confrontational. | |
| Sep 17, 2018 at 22:10 | history | edited | Alex | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Changed title.
|
| Sep 17, 2018 at 22:07 | comment | added | Alex | @Randal'Thor I was aiming for non-confrontational. Do you have any suggestions? | |
| Sep 17, 2018 at 22:06 | comment | added | Rand al'Thor Mod | Might I suggest that you rephrase the title to something a bit less confrontational? When people see a title like that, they'll come here expecting a "you ****s closed my question" rant, which this isn't. | |
| Sep 17, 2018 at 21:54 | history | asked | Alex | CC BY-SA 4.0 |