Timeline for What is the proper recourse for bubble-burster comments?

7 events

when toggle format	what		by	license	comment
May 31, 2017 at 20:07	comment	added	Radhil		@Valorum - I think we can acknowledge it. That one Potter example is just easy because the author admitted it. Other examples are harder to prove because it's the right answer to those not interested in the details and the wrong answer (and a possible cop out) to those who are. I wouldn't mind seeing it brought up more often, just with more tact or respect - but that's a limited resource around here, for questioners, answerers, and the works in question all around.
May 30, 2017 at 20:40	comment	added	Valorum		@duskwuff - Exactly. And if we can't acknowledge Bellisario's maxim here, where can we do it? Shows are made to limited budgets by small numbers of people under time pressure, working with actors who hate each other, many of whom are drunk, drugged, hung-over or just plain bored and didn't bother to read their lines
May 30, 2017 at 20:23	comment	added	user41830		Sometimes, the answer really is that the author didn't think of it. For example: Dudley Dursley's (time-travelling?) Playstation.
May 19, 2017 at 21:19	comment	added	Valorum		@zabeus - It has ever been thus.
May 19, 2017 at 21:17	comment	added	Z. Cochrane		And sometimes it's just because they're schmucks.
May 19, 2017 at 20:07	history	edited	Valorum	CC BY-SA 3.0	added 40 characters in body
May 19, 2017 at 19:47	history	answered	Valorum	CC BY-SA 3.0