Skip to main content
replaced http://scifi.stackexchange.com/ with https://scifi.stackexchange.com/
Source Link

Since the OP of the second question has openly acknowledged that it's a duplicate, I have no hesitation in closing it as such.

Per my commentcomment;

Please don't intentionally create duplicates. If you know it's a dupe but have extra info to share, add it as a comment on the original question (or even as an answer, if you feel your information is meaty enough).

At this point we should work toward two main aims;

  • Keeping a tidy site (Ensuring that the dupe gets closed)

  • Making sure that any additional info in the dupe is added to the original question (presumably in the form of a comment that the original OP will see).

Since the OP of the second question has openly acknowledged that it's a duplicate, I have no hesitation in closing it as such.

Per my comment;

Please don't intentionally create duplicates. If you know it's a dupe but have extra info to share, add it as a comment on the original question (or even as an answer, if you feel your information is meaty enough).

At this point we should work toward two main aims;

  • Keeping a tidy site (Ensuring that the dupe gets closed)

  • Making sure that any additional info in the dupe is added to the original question (presumably in the form of a comment that the original OP will see).

Since the OP of the second question has openly acknowledged that it's a duplicate, I have no hesitation in closing it as such.

Per my comment;

Please don't intentionally create duplicates. If you know it's a dupe but have extra info to share, add it as a comment on the original question (or even as an answer, if you feel your information is meaty enough).

At this point we should work toward two main aims;

  • Keeping a tidy site (Ensuring that the dupe gets closed)

  • Making sure that any additional info in the dupe is added to the original question (presumably in the form of a comment that the original OP will see).

Source Link
Valorum
  • 717.6k
  • 7
  • 118
  • 288

Since the OP of the second question has openly acknowledged that it's a duplicate, I have no hesitation in closing it as such.

Per my comment;

Please don't intentionally create duplicates. If you know it's a dupe but have extra info to share, add it as a comment on the original question (or even as an answer, if you feel your information is meaty enough).

At this point we should work toward two main aims;

  • Keeping a tidy site (Ensuring that the dupe gets closed)

  • Making sure that any additional info in the dupe is added to the original question (presumably in the form of a comment that the original OP will see).